Excellent question. But first you must ask, “What information is being omitted?” to answer that question. Then it leads you to the question of why and who would intentionally lie to us? I bet you thought history was boring…
Let’s explore this theory shall we? First let’s ask ourselves what didn’t we talk about in kindergarten through 12th grade history class. Did you learn about the holocaust in school? I didn’t. What about the asian culture and eastern medicine? I didn’t. Did you learn about women’s suffrage? I didn’t. Did you learn that Africans kidnapped their own people’s, took them to the west coast of Africa and sold them? Did you learn that men have been enslaving others since the dawn of humanity and still do today? Did you learn that in many Eastern cultures it is acceptable to sell your daughter into prostitution to pay your debts? Did you learn anything about the Middle East? Did you learn anything about Scotland and Ireland while you were learning about the English monarchy? Did you learn much about any other countries or cultures? Did you learn the specifics about World War II? Did you learn about all the political mistakes of the Vietnam War? I missed out on all of this and so much more. Most of topics I’ve had to read about myself. As a matter of fact, as I’ve put some thought into it, I’ve made a list of some of the history books I want to read! There’s a sentence I thought I’d never write. But there’s something about being deprived of information and opportunity that does put a rise in me.
So now that we have covered many of the subjects not taught in school, that leads us to our next question. Why were we not taught all these things? Ok, some topics like the holocaust and slavery are too much for elementary and middle school. But a high school student could handle it. Why would I say that? A 16-year-old may not be legally able to get into a rated-R horror film but no doubt in my mind that they watch them anyway. If a 16-year-old can watch a dreadful movie like “Saw”, then they can learn about real human atrocities and hopefully realize they have real consequences.
Why not teach us everything on the list? “Oh, Dana”, you say, “there just isn’t enough room in the curriculum.” I bet we could take some non-teaching lessons out. For instance, the Aztecs and Mayans. Great and interesting people. Spend a day telling me how it’s wrong to take advantage of weaker more uneducated people then move on. The entire English monarchy, wow, really? That is information I needed? How about you sum up most of it with, “They are mentally unstable and power-hungry”. Then touch on the important life lessons, such as: Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. This covers almost all monarchies. And no offense to all the pottery-makers but if you’ve seen one pottery making civilization, you’ve seen them all!
I enjoyed learning that the Romans were one of the first with a sophisticated sewage system. Cool. They did have a government structure. They had a booming economy. But the real lessons to learn were how did they survive, what was socially acceptable in those times, how did they begin and end? This information can help us today, yes? What worked then? Could it work today? What didn’t work and why? What great topic starters for a class discussion!
We were old enough to handle the serious stuff and there was room in the curriculum (after we ditched and/or condensed the not so important or pivotal). So help me out, why the holes in our history books? Because, educators don’t want us to think? Controversy and ugliness is only for adults? Then how do you prepare adolescents to be adults if you don’t introduce them to past controversy and ugliness? We weren’t taught this information because educators want to pretend it never happened?
Here’s my problem with the omissions though. How does society and do people in general not make the mistakes of their ancestors if they don’t know what those mistakes were? How do you make the world a better place, if you know little to nothing about its past? How do you learn about yourself if you don’t know where you come from? How do you understand people different from you if you don’t know where they come from?
All of this pertinent information is being grazed over at best, omitted at worst and I can’t find a logical reason as to why. Perhaps it’s just part of that whole, “dumbing down” of school children program where less information is taught so everyone passes the exam. And that’s a whole separate blog.
Here's the solution to walk away with though. Just because the government, directly through the educational system, deems you and your children too simple-minded or just prefers general populace ignorance doesn't mean you have to acquiesce. The past is there to learn from, so try that out. You'd be fascinated to learn how applicable it is.
Let’s explore this theory shall we? First let’s ask ourselves what didn’t we talk about in kindergarten through 12th grade history class. Did you learn about the holocaust in school? I didn’t. What about the asian culture and eastern medicine? I didn’t. Did you learn about women’s suffrage? I didn’t. Did you learn that Africans kidnapped their own people’s, took them to the west coast of Africa and sold them? Did you learn that men have been enslaving others since the dawn of humanity and still do today? Did you learn that in many Eastern cultures it is acceptable to sell your daughter into prostitution to pay your debts? Did you learn anything about the Middle East? Did you learn anything about Scotland and Ireland while you were learning about the English monarchy? Did you learn much about any other countries or cultures? Did you learn the specifics about World War II? Did you learn about all the political mistakes of the Vietnam War? I missed out on all of this and so much more. Most of topics I’ve had to read about myself. As a matter of fact, as I’ve put some thought into it, I’ve made a list of some of the history books I want to read! There’s a sentence I thought I’d never write. But there’s something about being deprived of information and opportunity that does put a rise in me.
So now that we have covered many of the subjects not taught in school, that leads us to our next question. Why were we not taught all these things? Ok, some topics like the holocaust and slavery are too much for elementary and middle school. But a high school student could handle it. Why would I say that? A 16-year-old may not be legally able to get into a rated-R horror film but no doubt in my mind that they watch them anyway. If a 16-year-old can watch a dreadful movie like “Saw”, then they can learn about real human atrocities and hopefully realize they have real consequences.
Why not teach us everything on the list? “Oh, Dana”, you say, “there just isn’t enough room in the curriculum.” I bet we could take some non-teaching lessons out. For instance, the Aztecs and Mayans. Great and interesting people. Spend a day telling me how it’s wrong to take advantage of weaker more uneducated people then move on. The entire English monarchy, wow, really? That is information I needed? How about you sum up most of it with, “They are mentally unstable and power-hungry”. Then touch on the important life lessons, such as: Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. This covers almost all monarchies. And no offense to all the pottery-makers but if you’ve seen one pottery making civilization, you’ve seen them all!
I enjoyed learning that the Romans were one of the first with a sophisticated sewage system. Cool. They did have a government structure. They had a booming economy. But the real lessons to learn were how did they survive, what was socially acceptable in those times, how did they begin and end? This information can help us today, yes? What worked then? Could it work today? What didn’t work and why? What great topic starters for a class discussion!
We were old enough to handle the serious stuff and there was room in the curriculum (after we ditched and/or condensed the not so important or pivotal). So help me out, why the holes in our history books? Because, educators don’t want us to think? Controversy and ugliness is only for adults? Then how do you prepare adolescents to be adults if you don’t introduce them to past controversy and ugliness? We weren’t taught this information because educators want to pretend it never happened?
Here’s my problem with the omissions though. How does society and do people in general not make the mistakes of their ancestors if they don’t know what those mistakes were? How do you make the world a better place, if you know little to nothing about its past? How do you learn about yourself if you don’t know where you come from? How do you understand people different from you if you don’t know where they come from?
All of this pertinent information is being grazed over at best, omitted at worst and I can’t find a logical reason as to why. Perhaps it’s just part of that whole, “dumbing down” of school children program where less information is taught so everyone passes the exam. And that’s a whole separate blog.
Here's the solution to walk away with though. Just because the government, directly through the educational system, deems you and your children too simple-minded or just prefers general populace ignorance doesn't mean you have to acquiesce. The past is there to learn from, so try that out. You'd be fascinated to learn how applicable it is.